That date of 1000 AD was based on just twoof the organic samples taken from parts of the...
Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
That date of 1000 AD was based on just two
of the organic samples taken from parts of the mound
that may have been later reconstructed, because another archaeological survey
found samples from the serpent's base dating back to 321 BC. The evidence that Serpent Mound was the subject of a restoration
is very clear
of the organic samples taken from parts of the mound
that may have been later reconstructed, because another archaeological survey
found samples from the serpent's base dating back to 321 BC. The evidence that Serpent Mound was the subject of a restoration
is very clear
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:02.918
That date of 1000 AD
00:00:02.995 --> 00:00:05.834
was based on just two
of the organic samples
00:00:05.091 --> 00:00:09.209
taken from parts of the mound
that may have been later reconstructed,
00:00:10.667 --> 00:00:14.503
because another archaeological survey
found samples from the serpent's base
00:00:14.058 --> 00:00:17.918
dating back to 321 BC.
00:00:19.049 --> 00:00:21.006
The evidence that Serpent Mound was
00:00:21.677 --> 00:00:24.439
the subject of a restoration
is very clear.
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
What if everything we know about prehistory is wrong? Journalist Graham Hancock visits archaeological sites around the world investigating if a civilization far more advanced than we ever believed possible existed thousands of yea...
