Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
What we do know
is that in the years that followed, the authenticity of the teeth
was officially downplayed. And to this day,
the history books continue to insist that no human species ever reached Malta
until around 7,900 years ago. Why is archaeology so opposed
to the notion of earlier humans?
is that in the years that followed, the authenticity of the teeth
was officially downplayed. And to this day,
the history books continue to insist that no human species ever reached Malta
until around 7,900 years ago. Why is archaeology so opposed
to the notion of earlier humans?
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:04.069
What we do know
is that in the years that followed,
00:00:04.146 --> 00:00:07.406
the authenticity of the teeth
was officially downplayed.
00:00:08.634 --> 00:00:11.549
And to this day,
the history books continue to insist
00:00:11.626 --> 00:00:16.843
that no human species ever reached Malta
until around 7,900 years ago.
00:00:17.038 --> 00:00:21.447
Why is archaeology so opposed
to the notion of earlier humans?
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
What if everything we know about prehistory is wrong? Journalist Graham Hancock visits archaeological sites around the world investigating if a civilization far more advanced than we ever believed possible existed thousands of yea...