In 1986,DNA testing is in its infancy, but with the degraded conditionof the crime scene,...
Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
NARRATOR: In 1986,
DNA testing is in its infancy, but with the degraded condition
of the crime scene, finding useful samples
or even fingerprints is unlikely. DET. BALL: These were
very difficult cases, um, when you're dealing
with skeletal remains. You don't have the luxury
of the obvious pieces of evidence being found
at a "normal crime scene." There was nothing, really,
to go on, as far as identification,
et cetera
DNA testing is in its infancy, but with the degraded condition
of the crime scene, finding useful samples
or even fingerprints is unlikely. DET. BALL: These were
very difficult cases, um, when you're dealing
with skeletal remains. You don't have the luxury
of the obvious pieces of evidence being found
at a "normal crime scene." There was nothing, really,
to go on, as far as identification,
et cetera
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:04.879
NARRATOR: In 1986,
DNA testing is in its infancy,
00:00:04.921 --> 00:00:07.966
but with the degraded condition
of the crime scene,
00:00:08.997 --> 00:00:10.385
finding useful samples
or even fingerprints
00:00:10.426 --> 00:00:12.022
is unlikely.
00:00:12.261 --> 00:00:14.138
DET. BALL: These were
very difficult cases,
00:00:14.018 --> 00:00:16.001
um, when you're dealing
with skeletal remains.
00:00:16.999 --> 00:00:18.476
You don't have the luxury
of the obvious pieces
00:00:18.518 --> 00:00:23.106
of evidence being found
at a "normal crime scene."
00:00:23.147 --> 00:00:26.192
There was nothing, really,
to go on,
00:00:26.234 --> 00:00:28.319
as far as identification,
et cetera.
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
Examines true-crime stories of victims found buried in the least suspicious places.
