A creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion? 'Strang verboten'? How come?...
Something wrong with the clip?
Quote
David Berlinski:
Suppose we find, simply as a matter of fact, that our scientific inquiries point in one direction: a creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion? 'Strang verboten'? How come? Why?
Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:04.002
Suppose we find simply as a matter of fact
00:00:04.002 --> 00:00:07.003
that our scientific inquiries point in one direction
00:00:07.003 --> 00:00:09.001
Which is that there is an intelligent creator
00:00:09.001 --> 00:00:11.006
Why should we eliminate that from discussion
00:00:11.006 --> 00:00:13.005
Streng verboten How come Why
Clip duration: 15 seconds
Views: 118
Timestamp in movie: 00h 42m 47s
Uploaded: 26 November, 2022
Genres: documentary
Summary: Ben Stein examines the issue of academic freedom and decides that there is none when it comes to the debate over intelligent design.
Comments
00:17 People who tell you
00:25 I'm finally just beginning to grasp
00:12 What other societies have used darwinism
00:16 Stein but will eradicating religion
00:19 No gods no life after death
00:12 If you look at the detail
00:29 Hasn't this all been resolved
00:15 It'd be nice to see the scientific establishment
00:20 We don't know what caused life to arise
00:10 Egnor there's nothing to be learned in neurosurgery
00:54 Now that is a possibility and an intriguing possibility
00:42 Before you can ask is darwinian theory correct or not
00:16 This conflict
00:20 We are losing our freedom
00:42 Mcgrath richard dawkins has a charming
00:43 I mean what have you been doing
00:21 I think it was just a catastrophic mistake
00:18 We know the sort of event that must've happened
00:15 Suppose we find simply as a matter of fact