No further questions

Pete Kane:
Detective Wallace, I'm not gonna try to match biblical knowledge with you. But isn't it true that these gospel accounts vary widely in what they say, that there are numerous discrepancies between these accounts? Jim Warner Wallace:
Absolutely, but that's exactly what we should expect. Pete Kane:
I don't quite understand that. Jim Warner Wallace:
Well, reliable eyewitness accounts always differ slightly in the way they recall the story. They're coming to it from different geographic perspectives, their history, even where they are located in the room. When I examined the gospels, I was trying to determine if these were accurate, reliable accounts, in spite of any differences there might be between the accounts. Pete Kane:
Ah, and as a devout Christian, you feel you succeeded? Jim Warner Wallace:
Ah, Mr. Kane. I think you misunderstand me. When I began this study, I was a devout atheist. I began examining the gospels as a committed skeptic, not as a believer. You see, I wasn't raised in a Christian environment, although I do think I have an unusually high regard for the value of evidence. I'm not a Christian because I was raised that way or because I hoped it would satisfy some need or accomplish some goal. I'm simply a Christian because it's evidentially true. Pete Kane:
Motion to strike, Your Honor. Judge Stennis:
Granted. Jury's instructed to ignore Detective Wallace's last remarks. Pete Kane:
No further questions