Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
ERIC: But the protections
that are in place, though, is that the military has
a really expansive voir dire, which is a process
of questioning the members and then challenging them
afterwards, and as long as the defense
council can come up with a plausible reason why
a panel member shouldn't sit, then the military judge
is supposed to, uh, excuse that panel member
that are in place, though, is that the military has
a really expansive voir dire, which is a process
of questioning the members and then challenging them
afterwards, and as long as the defense
council can come up with a plausible reason why
a panel member shouldn't sit, then the military judge
is supposed to, uh, excuse that panel member
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:02.835
ERIC: But the protections
that are in place, though,
00:00:02.096 --> 00:00:05.504
is that the military has
a really expansive voir dire,
00:00:05.671 --> 00:00:07.715
which is a process
of questioning the members
00:00:07.084 --> 00:00:09.341
and then challenging them
afterwards,
00:00:09.508 --> 00:00:12.428
and as long as the defense
council can come up
00:00:12.553 --> 00:00:15.723
with a plausible reason why
a panel member shouldn't sit,
00:00:15.089 --> 00:00:17.085
then the military judge
is supposed to, uh,
00:00:18.999 --> 00:00:19.477
excuse that panel member.
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
A journey through The Army's criminal justice system seen through the lens of controversial case of Clint Lorance.