So would I!
Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
Vinny Gambini:
Ms. Vito, it has been argued by me, the defence, that two sets of guys met up at the Sac-O-Suds, at the same time, driving identical metallic mint green 1964 Buick Skylark convertibles. Now, can you tell us by what you see in this picture, if the defence's case holds water? Mona Lisa Vito:
[Lisa examines the picture] Vinny Gambini:
Ms. Vito, please answer the question: does the defence's case hold water? Mona Lisa Vito:
No! The defence is wrong! Vinny Gambini:
Are you sure? Mona Lisa Vito:
I'm positive. Vinny Gambini:
How could you be so sure? Mona Lisa Vito:
Because there is no way that these tire marks were made by a 1964 Buick Skylark convertible. These marks were made by a 1963 Pontiac Tempest. D.A. Jim Trotter:
Objection, Your Honor! Can we clarify to the court whether the witness is stating opinion or fact? Judge Chamberlain Haller:
[to Lisa]
This is your opinion? Mona Lisa Vito:
It's a fact! Vinny Gambini:
I find it hard to believe that this kind of information could be ascertained simply by looking at a picture! Mona Lisa Vito:
Would you like me to explain? Vinny Gambini:
I would *love* to hear this! Judge Chamberlain Haller:
So would I!
Ms. Vito, it has been argued by me, the defence, that two sets of guys met up at the Sac-O-Suds, at the same time, driving identical metallic mint green 1964 Buick Skylark convertibles. Now, can you tell us by what you see in this picture, if the defence's case holds water? Mona Lisa Vito:
[Lisa examines the picture] Vinny Gambini:
Ms. Vito, please answer the question: does the defence's case hold water? Mona Lisa Vito:
No! The defence is wrong! Vinny Gambini:
Are you sure? Mona Lisa Vito:
I'm positive. Vinny Gambini:
How could you be so sure? Mona Lisa Vito:
Because there is no way that these tire marks were made by a 1964 Buick Skylark convertible. These marks were made by a 1963 Pontiac Tempest. D.A. Jim Trotter:
Objection, Your Honor! Can we clarify to the court whether the witness is stating opinion or fact? Judge Chamberlain Haller:
[to Lisa]
This is your opinion? Mona Lisa Vito:
It's a fact! Vinny Gambini:
I find it hard to believe that this kind of information could be ascertained simply by looking at a picture! Mona Lisa Vito:
Would you like me to explain? Vinny Gambini:
I would *love* to hear this! Judge Chamberlain Haller:
So would I!
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:04.503
Ms Vito please answer the question
00:00:04.587 --> 00:00:08.548
Does the defense's case hold water
00:00:12.512 --> 00:00:13.678
No
00:00:15.181 --> 00:00:16.973
The defense is wrong
00:00:20.353 --> 00:00:22.354
Are you sure
00:00:22.438 --> 00:00:25.023
I'm positive
00:00:25.108 --> 00:00:27.526
How could you be so sure
00:00:28.694 --> 00:00:31.321
Because there is no way that these tire marks were made
00:00:31.406 --> 00:00:33.782
by a '64 Buick Skylark
00:00:33.866 --> 00:00:37.494
These marks were made by a 1963 Pontiac Tempest
00:00:37.578 --> 00:00:39.496
Objection Your Honor Can we clarify to the court
00:00:39.058 --> 00:00:41.498
whether the witness is stating opinion or fact
00:00:41.582 --> 00:00:45.127
This is your opinion It's a fact
00:00:45.211 --> 00:00:49.339
I find it hard to believe that this kind of information
00:00:49.424 --> 00:00:52.968
could be ascertained simply by looking at a picture
00:00:53.052 --> 00:00:55.887
Would you like me to explain
00:00:55.972 --> 00:00:59.349
I would love to hear this So would I
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
Two New Yorkers accused of murder in rural Alabama while on their way back to college call in the help of one of their cousins, a loudmouth lawyer with no trial experience.
