Here, here.Uh. "Olmstead vs. the U.S. The dissent arguesfor a wider application of the...
Join the conversation
Log in or create an account to leave a comment
Log In
Here, here.
Uh. "Olmstead vs. the U.S. The dissent argues
for a wider application of the exclusionary principle."
It's post-Mayen. Maybe Durkin would be open
to the illegal search, - and seizure angle.
- You talk to Anita about work?
Uh. "Olmstead vs. the U.S. The dissent argues
for a wider application of the exclusionary principle."
It's post-Mayen. Maybe Durkin would be open
to the illegal search, - and seizure angle.
- You talk to Anita about work?
Full Transcript
00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:04.212
Here, here.
Uh. "Olmstead vs. the U.S.
00:00:04.212 --> 00:00:06.506
The dissent argues
for a wider application
00:00:06.506 --> 00:00:09.175
of the exclusionary principle."
It's post-Mayen.
00:00:09.175 --> 00:00:12.047
Maybe Durkin would be open
to the illegal search,
00:00:12.047 --> 00:00:15.181
- and seizure angle.
- You talk to Anita about work?
Want This Clip in HD?
Upgrade for HD/4K downloads and unlimited access. Upgrade now →
Movie Summary
The cases of a master criminal defense attorney, handling the most difficult of cases in the aid of the innocent.
