Want HD quality instead of ads? Get Pro
To watch in HD, get ClipCafe PRO
I pieced together the photos of every murder and I laid them out chronologically
Unmute video

I pieced together the photos of every murder and I laid them out chronologically. Oh, that...

Something wrong with the clip?

Quote

Oliver: I pieced together the photos of every murder and I laid them out chronologically. Oh, that red line right there indicates where his killing became erratic and inexplicable. So, all you've gotta do is set up a null hypothesis and try and prove it. And when you can't prove it, that means your original hypothesis must be true. Ben Geary: Wait, wait. Oliver: Take some fact. You said you believe Cassius returns to the scene of the crimes. And you've got photos of every murder. So set up a hypothesis of, say, Stephen Hawking is Cassius... which gives you a null hypothesis of Stephen Hawking is not Cassius. So, go through the photos and try and prove the null... that Rolling Thunder is not Cassius. If you can, that means your hypothesis is incorrect. If you can't... then depending on your "P" value of course... you've statistically proven your hypothesis must be true. Or that Stephen Hawking is Cassius. Yeah. Some of us didn't sleep our way through Logic and Stats at Harvard.


Transcript

00:00:01.000 --> 00:00:05.086
I pieced together the photos of every murder and I laid them out chronologically
00:00:05.171 --> 00:00:07.422
Oh that red line right there indicates
00:00:07.506 --> 00:00:09.966
where his killing became erratic and inexplicable
00:00:10.051 --> 00:00:13.595
So all you've gotta do is set up a null hypothesis and try and prove it
00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:16.932
And when you can't prove it that means your original hypothesis must be true
00:00:17.998 --> 00:00:18.141
Wait wait
00:00:18.226 --> 00:00:20.435
Take some fact
00:00:20.519 --> 00:00:23.271
You said you believe Cassius returns to the scene of the crimes
00:00:23.356 --> 00:00:25.044
And you've got photos of every murder
00:00:25.524 --> 00:00:28.318
So set up a hypothesis of say Stephen Hawking is Cassius
00:00:28.402 --> 00:00:31.947
which gives you a null hypothesis of Stephen Hawking is not Cassius
00:00:32.999 --> 00:00:34.449
So go through the photos and try and prove the null
00:00:34.533 --> 00:00:37.202
that Rolling Thunder is not Cassius
00:00:37.286 --> 00:00:40.121
If you can that means your hypothesis is incorrect If you can't
00:00:40.206 --> 00:00:42.165
then depending on your P value of course
00:00:42.025 --> 00:00:44.834
you've statistically proven your hypothesis must be true
00:00:44.919 --> 00:00:47.963
Or that Stephen Hawking is Cassius
00:00:48.997 --> 00:00:50.173
Yeah
00:00:50.258 --> 00:00:54.998
Some of us didn't sleep our way through Logic and Stats at Harvard

Clip duration: 57 seconds
Views: 156
Timestamp in movie: 01h 06m 30s
Uploaded: 18 November, 2022
Genres: action, crime, drama
Summary: A retired CIA operative is paired with a young FBI agent to unravel the mystery of a senator's murder, with all signs pointing to a Soviet assassin.


Comments

You can comment anonymously or Log In
No comments yet 🧐 Be the first!

Actors